Papoyan Appoints Pashinyan’s Former Assistant as Manager of Araratcement; Corruption Prevention Commission Finds No Conflict of Interest

The appointment of Davit Gevorgyan as manager of the state-owned Araratcement is another reason to question the transparency of Nikol Pashinyan’s team’s personnel policy, particularly when it comes to the management of state assets. Before that, Gevorgyan held the position of assistant to the Prime Minister, and subsequently, by decision of Economy Minister Gevorg Papoyan, he received the position of manager of an enterprise that had come under state management. The decision to transfer the company’s shares to state management had been made within the framework of civil proceedings for the confiscation of property.
The speed of the personnel decision is noteworthy: on July 30, 2026, Gevorgyan was dismissed from the position of assistant to the Prime Minister, and on the same day, Papoyan appointed him manager of Araratcement. A short time later, the company’s Board of Directors appointed him acting Chief Executive Officer. Meanwhile, Gevorgyan’s publicly available biographical information does not indicate any experience managing a major industrial enterprise or working in the cement production sector.
Citizen Semyon Babayan appealed to the Corruption Prevention Commission, seeing possible signs of a conflict of interest in the appointment. However, in its decision of October 12, the Commission refused to initiate proceedings. According to a publication by Iravaban.net, the Commission found insufficient grounds for initiating such proceedings, arguing, among other things, that there is no legally established procedure for selecting a manager for an enterprise of this kind.
The issue of the government’s political responsibility lies precisely here. The absence of a mandatory competition does not yet mean that the appointment was transparent, justified, or in the public interest. The government, which constantly makes declarations about fighting corruption and renewing the system, is obliged to explain why it entrusted the management of an industrial asset of strategic importance to a person from the Prime Minister’s close administrative circle. The Corruption Prevention Commission’s refusal to initiate proceedings does not relieve Papoyan of responsibility for this personnel decision, nor does it relieve the government of its obligation to make the appointment criteria public.