If the Marriage Has Ended, Then in What Capacity Is Anna Hakobyan Traveling to the U.S. at the Expense of the State Budget?

By a decision of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan dated June 11, Anna Hakobyan is being sent to the United States to participate in the annual event of the Global First Ladies Academy. In the document, she is presented as the “prime minister’s wife,” while the expenses of the trip are to be reimbursed from state funds.

However, this decision raises questions, taking into account Anna Hakobyan’s earlier public statements. In February 2026, she announced that her civil marriage with Nikol Pashinyan had ended, and days later she again confirmed that she was leaving the government residence and moving to a separate apartment. Later, the prime minister spoke about efforts being made to preserve the family, but no information has been presented to the public that the couple had restored their relationship or that Anna Hakobyan’s stated status had changed.

Against this background, it is unclear on what legal or official basis Anna Hakobyan is presenting herself as the “prime minister’s wife” and participating in an international event in that capacity. The question also arises as to whether a trip financed with state budget funds is consistent with the factual situation that was publicly announced.

It is noteworthy that the government decision also does not disclose the total cost of the trip. The public is therefore deprived of the opportunity to assess how much money will be spent on the planned trip to New York, accommodation, and daily allowances. If the authorities continue to regard Anna Hakobyan as the prime minister’s wife, they should clearly explain the grounds for this status. Otherwise, this trip carried out at the expense of the state budget may raise legitimate questions regarding its legality and the appropriateness of using public funds.

armtribunal.com

Hetq: The 300,000-Dram “Opel” Leased for 1.99 Million Drams a Year: An Intriguing State Procurement Story Involving the Brother of Civil Contract MP Karen Hambardzumyan

In the picture on the left is Karen Hambardzumyan, a former Prosperous Armenia Party member, now a Civil Contract member, formerly Governor of Syunik Province and currently a Civil Contract MP. In the picture on the right is his brother, Tigran Hambardzumyan. In 2025, the latter purchased a 1998 Opel vehicle for 300,000 drams and leased it to the “Sisian Territorial Pedagogical-Psychological Support Center” SNCO for 1,990,000 drams per year.

Read more

The Tsaghkadzor Sports Complex in the Hands of the Zakaryan Family: Hetq’s Investigation

Hetq’s investigation reconstructs the path by which Tsaghkadzor’s main sports complex passed from the state into the hands of Ishkhan Zakaryan’s family.

Read more

“You for Us, Us for You”: Is the State Budget the Ruling Party’s Pocket?

While ordinary citizens are under a heavy tax burden, and many businesses struggle to survive under conditions of market competition, the government has opened the “doors” of the state budget for the “chosen.” An investigation by Infocom.am reveals one of the darkest corners of Armenia’s political-business system: businesses exempted from customs duties express their “gratitude” to the ruling “Civil Contract” (CP) party and the “My Step” Foundation headed by the Prime Minister’s wife, Anna Hakobyan, in the form of multi-million-dram donations.

Read more

The Overthrow of the Constitutional Order in Armenia: How Pashinyan’s Government Usurped the Judicial and Legislative Branches

The Constitution of the Republic of Armenia places the principle of separation and balancing of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches at the foundation of the exercise of state power. Article 5 of the Constitution formulates the structure of government in precisely these terms, while Article 162 establishes that justice is administered only by courts, and any interference in the administration of justice is prohibited.

Read more

“Just Business?” Narek Nalbandyan’s Interview Raises New Questions

Nalbandyan has tried to present the expansion of his business as the result exclusively of economic calculations—bank financing, investments, acquisition of troubled assets, auctions, and market risk. He has denied the existence of any personal, family, or business ties with Nikol Pashinyan and his family. However, when the conversation reaches the most sensitive questions—the purchase price of HrazdanCement, the course of the auctions, former employees’ unpaid wages, and possible ties with the authorities—the same pattern can be observed in the answers: a specific question is followed by a general formulation, while the essence of the issue is shifted into the realm of documents, procedures, or general economic logic.

Read more

Contact information

For inquiries regarding collaboration or information about the organization’s activities, please use the contact details provided.

Contact form